![]() “Let’s wait until Wednesday before making a decision. However, the main Ferrari Formula 1 team underestimates the potential performance that such an amount could bring, even for a minor offense, which means overspending a budget cap of 5% or about $7 million. Most of the speculation has focused on Red Bull, which is believed to have gone over its budget for 2021, which is pegged at $145 million by the FIA, with Aston Martin’s offenses either minor or procedural. Rumors had circulated in the paddock that Red Bull and Aston Martin had breached F1’s cost cap rules ahead of last weekend’s Singapore Grand Prix, but both teams have denied the claims. The FIA (Fédération Internationale Automobile) is expected to release the results of its audit of the budget caps for all F1 teams for 2021 on Wednesday. Unfortunately, the teams can rarely agree on what day of the week it is, let alone something important, so good luck with that.Ferrari F1 boss Mattia Binotto has said that even a “slight” cut from the team’s budget cap could translate into a boost of half a second per lap. The only way it might stop is if all the other teams band together to oppose Ferrari's privileges. They have worked well for the team, so why change the strategy?Īs long as F1's organisers demonstrate that they will give in to the slightest pressure from Maranello, Ferrari should continue to push for every advantage it can get. However, we should still expect future bluffs from Ferrari. The idea was scrapped at the time, but has been resurrected for 2015, so far without any Ferrari ultimatums. ![]() As recently as 2009, the Italian team threatened to quit over the imposition of a budget cap. Its threats are designed to provoke a specific reaction-a particular benefit for the team. To go back to the original analogy, can you imagine English Premier League CEO Richard Scudamore announcing a rule change to benefit just one of the league's teams? Exactly.įerrari is not going anywhere. How the rule specifically helps Ferrari is quite beyond me, but the fact that the F1 CEO is openly trying to help one of the teams is simply ridiculous. The FIA again denied any favouritism.Įarlier this month, Ecclestone told City A.M. that the controversial new double-points rule has been introduced to help Ferrari. Then, in 2008, similar complaints were voiced by McLaren when Lewis Hamilton retroactively lost his victory at the Belgian Grand Prix for cutting a chicane. But Mosley's comments hint at another complaint of Ferrari's rivals: Aside from the explicit privileges accorded to the Italian team, there has often been the feeling that Ferrari has received favourable treatment at specific races or when judgements need to be made by the FIA on a particular issue.Ī few examples: In 2006, the FIA was forced to deny allegations by Renault team principal Flavio Briatore that it was assisting Ferrari by banning an aerodynamic device on the Renault cars. Of course, we now know that Ferrari is not treated like every other team. Should we find irregularities on a Ferrari-like the moveable floor after the Australian Grand Prix-it is removed and banned. But should we find it necessary to impose our technical or sporting regulations, than Ferrari is treated like any other team. Mosley responded: Yes, firstly, because it holds a historically important position, as the team has been involved in Formula One since 1950. In 2007, then-FIA president Max Mosley was asked in an interview with the official F1 website whether Ferrari was more important than the sport's other teams. These include a special payment from the F1 prize fund, and vetoes on Ecclestone's successor and on changes to the sport's technical regulations. This fear has allowed Ferrari to build a list of benefits that its rivals are not privy to. Yet there is a perpetual fear in F1, stoked by Ferrari's periodic sabre-rattling, that the Italian constructors will withdraw from the championship if this or that new regulation is not to their liking.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |