These species can beĭifferentiated by the “inconspicuous inner naris, compressed tail, and absence of a marmoratus, mainly due to the flattened head. fuscus, along with a “zone of distal crown expansion” closer to However, there are minor morphologicalĭifferences between the two, including tooth morphology, in which D. Is the best way to differentiate between the two. fuscus were considered the same species and genetics Planiceps having a flattened head, dorsal makings (see next paragraph), and tan spots on the quadramaculatus but can be differentiated by D. Side with a rounded ventral side (Newman 1955).ĭesmognathus planiceps looks very similar to many species of the genus Desmognathus, The tail has a slender keel in the dorsal The relative finger lengths are 1 < 4 < 2 < 3Īnd relative toe lengths are 1 < 5 < 2 < 3 < 4. Like the body the digits have minimal webbing. The vent is “slightly raised.” The legs are stout The vertical groove extends from the sinuous groove to the junction of the jaw.ĭesmognathus planiceps has a large body that has 14 costal grooves and a range of 3 - 5 The sinuous groove extends form the superior edge of the gular fold to Two grooves have been identified on the head of the Enlarged cheeks have been described along with “pointed” mental The species has a “strongly depressed snout” with the gradient lasting from the eyes Ranges from 20 to 63 mm with some male individuals described as exceeding 120 mm in total The average snout-vent length of the species Orrell T.Physical Description - Desmognathus planiceps is a salamander species with a broad and flat head, stout andįlattened body, and laterally flattened tail. ↑ ITIS: The Integrated Taxonomic Information System.Check date values in: |accessdate= ( help) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link) "Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life: 2011 Annual Checklist". ↑ 12.0 12.1 Bisby F.A., Roskov Y.R., Orrell T.M., Nicolson D., Paglinawan L.E., Bailly N., Kirk P.M., Bourgoin T., Baillargeon G., Ouvrard D.(2003) Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico: Update, Herpetological Review, vol. Campbell, Kevin de Quieroz, Darrel Frost, et al. ↑ Crother, Brian I., Jeff Boundy, Jonathan A.(2008) Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, With Comments Regarding Confidence in Our Understanding, Sixth Ed., Herpetological Circular No. ↑ Crother, Brian I., Jeff Boundy, Frank T.Starnes (2004), Checklist of Vertebrates of the United States, the U.S. ↑ (2004), database, Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference.(1990), Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians and Reptiles, Third Edition Collins (1991), A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians, Eastern and Central North America, Third Edition (2000) Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in Our Understanding, Herpetological Circular, no. (1997), Amphibian Species of the World, A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference v5.3 Check date values in: |accessdate= ( help) International Union for Conservation of Nature. Ginklasipika han IUCN an species komo diri gud kababarak-an. An Desmognathus fuscus in nahilalakip ha genus nga Desmognathus, ngan familia nga Plethodontidae. Desmognathus phoca ( Matthes, 1855) ĭesmognathus fuscus ( Green, 1818) Īn Desmognathus fuscus in uska species han Caudata nga syahan ginhulagway ni Rafinesque hadton 1820.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |